Skip to main content

Should the Grind Ever Stop?

     I am the type of person that watches all YouTube videos at double speed and still finds them slow and listens to podcasts to and from school at double speed. Audiobooks and even Netflix shows - all watched/listened to at double speed. So, I was thinking about this recently and the reason for my tendency to do this. Am I living my life in double speed? Is it simply my desire to learn more in a shorter period of time? Is that a symptom of my desire to constantly be productive - to cram in every second of productivity even within my time for entertainment? Or maybe my short attention span that tries to convert long-form entertainment into the quick speed of mindless Tik Tok and Instagram scrolling?

    This week I decided to focus on the first hypothesis - my desire to be constantly productive. I wanted to give a quick disclaimer: I am, by no stretch of the imagination, productive all the time. However, I do think many of us, myself included, feel the need to be exceedingly productive and therefore take seemingly strange actions to convince ourselves that we are being productive when that is far from reality and doesn't need to be reality. In my case, I find myself gravitating towards YouTube videos or podcasts in my free time but convincing myself that since it's at double speed, it's still productive. In reality, this is not necessarily a beneficial mentality because it falsely justifies the twisted narrative of productivity when I should be consuming these forms of entertainment with no ulterior thought of my efficiency. 

    In my life particularly, the idea of working is comforting: it's something I am familiar with. Because what do you do when you have been gifted the forbidden fruit of free time? We have learned not to indulge in it, and the looming freedom of choice present inherently in the concept of "free time" can be intimidating. Work is something we directly have control over - a means of minimizing the uncertainty that comes with the natural world. That is also why we all wanted to try to make quarantine a time of productivity. Many tried learning new skills not out of enjoyment but simply to expand their repertoire of marketable skills and thought that their quarantine was useless unless a new business was created and/or a learning journey embarked on ... all during a global pandemic. Inherently, these are not bad ideas but often the motivation for them doesn't encourage sustainability. And inevitably, when we don't reach every single goal of ours, it creates a sense of guilt and disappointment that only discourages future growth. 

    We have grown up in a culture that quantifies our value based on our output and productivity (which is basically how the value of machines is qualified). Especially in the United States, the "come-up" and the "grind" is valorized and "right-place and right-time" opportunities combined with privilege that often come alongside hard work are largely forgotten. This feeds, perfectly into the idea and prevalence of hustle culture that has contributed to the formation of this association. "The grind never stops" is the infamous phrase that has defined much of my generation's philosophy on work and work ethics. This constant desire to achieve the next thing, the next goal, the next task. With each mission, it's ok if our physical or mental health slowly starts slipping away. It's ok - we will deal with that when we finally achieve our goal. But as soon as it is achieved, we can't waste even a sliver of time - onto the next thing! 

    We even glorify the idea of sacrificing for our goals which leads to unnecessary stress and burnout and often actually decreases productivity. There have been many studies that focus on overworking within a structured work environment. Working long hours does not lead to a tangible difference in output. Between two studied groups - one that actually worked long hours and one that only pretended to, the amount they accomplished was very similar, and their managers noticed no significant difference in their work. Especially in settings where we are not forced/paid to work by the hour, there is no reason to work or even pretend to work for long hours because it does not increase the output we so desperately seek to achieve. Not only are there diminishing returns, but overworking can also contribute to a wide range of health problems from a higher risk of depression to heart disease, and it can even impair interpersonal communication skills. 

    After recognizing the harms of glorifying workaholism and the "counterproductivity" of overworking, it begs the question about what can be done about it. The first important step is to analyze our emotional relationship with our work and whether or not we fall into some of the cycles and thought patterns discussed above. Subsequently, removing the thought that there are better uses of time can help combat the negative emotions. We definitely shouldn't abandon productivity and the importance of determination. Honestly, this blog was a product of that mentality, and I am so grateful for it now. But, I do believe that I have been able to convert it from something that defines my self-worth to now a creative outlet for some of my thoughts. And, it is important to recognize the merit and necessity of unrestricted rest - one without the guilt of not working. I know I began this post with a short discussion about double speed and potentially living my life on double speed. I love listening to things faster, but my internal correlation between double speed and productivity is not the reason I should be consuming content or entertainment in this way. I should do it for the excitement and the joy of the content itself without any attachment to the tangible output it will produce in my life. Detangling the dependence of our self-worth on our productivity begins the journey of resilience as well as long-term sustainability and the quality of our work and more importantly, our lives. 

    Ultimately, my answer to the question "Should the Grind Ever Stop?": Yes. It should, and it needs to.

    Side Note: These are only my thoughts on the issue and definitely could have been explained more eloquently, so let me know if you have any thoughts on this topic. I also noticed the uncertainty manifesting in me as I began using passive language, like that described in my post on the gendered confidence gap, to describe most of my thoughts. I eventually tried to remove some of this language after conscious thought about it, but it was interesting to see some of my prior posts relate to this one. I should have full autonomy over my own blog but still felt this need to convey my uncertainty in the article. Also, if you are interested, I suggest reading the 2 articles below: they are incredibly insightful and I used some of the ideas and studies in the articles to expand on my own reflections. 

https://hbr.org/2015/08/the-research-is-clear-long-hours-backfire-for-people-and-for-companies 

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/toxic-productivity-work_l_606655e7c5b6aa24bc60a566#:~:text=Toxic%20productivity%20is%20essentially%20an,all%20times%2C%20at%20all%20costs.&text=Toxic%20productivity%20doesn't%20even,for%20not%20having%20done%20more. 

 Thanks for reading, 

Janvi :)



Comments

  1. In the natural world, staying horizontal (as against vertical) comes instinctively as the most convenient posture for all living beings, since everything else needs extra effort. Ages back homo sapiens went through the paradigm shift of walking on twos from the fours; soon enough it became the new norm. Remaining busy, not necessary "look busy", actually would signify diligence, self-motivation and determination; its habit forming. The downside could obviously be "early burnout", but does it really matter? Most high achievers and adventurers might fall in this category. We all are supposed to have best and maximum influence over our own actions, deeds and decisions, but sometimes we may let it be and not exercise adequate control. Thus, at times we may vacillate between self doubts, guilt or other such feelings of incompleteness.
    There is a definite need to be "effective or productive" (as compared to just being efficient, which may or may or not be productive) in all our doings. Ideally, I am of the view that one should follow the age-old dictum of "maintain balance in life"; easier said than done, though! Can we overcome this dilemma? Perhaps yes, this dictum needs to be modified in today's terminology - "work smart to balance"!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Science of Well-Being

Hello! Thank you to everyone who read the first post! And thank you to those who left positive feedback! It is much appreciated! In an attempt to be productive during my time at home, one of the things I have started (apart from this blog) is an online college course titled "The Science of Well-Being".  I think that the appeals of the material world and the constant life pressure to achieve can often be overwhelming and cause us to frequently sacrifice our well-being. Therefore, it can sometimes be helpful to take conscious efforts to improve our well-being, and this is my attempt at that. Although I have only completed one week of this class so far, I have enjoyed it and the new form of introspection it encourages. The class began with me determining my initial levels of happiness to be used as a measure of reference for my growth by the time the class ends. Through the use of the PERMA scale and the Authentic Happiness scale, I was to determine my happiness through self-...

Is Language Shaping Our Perception of Gender Roles?

Recently, I was thinking about what is traditionally considered gender bias. Immediately, the gender pay gap and the lack of women in leadership positions came to mind. Although these are incredibly important issues, I wanted to approach a different topic, one that doesn't immediately scream gender bias: linguistics. For this article, I wanted to take a dive into the ways that language can shape our perception of genders and affirm numerous gender stereotypes.  When reviewing the literature on this field, I found a fascinating article on the depth that gender bias permeates linguistic structure, and I wanted to share a couple of the most interesting ideas. To begin, in the English language, there are more words that refer to or describe men but 10 times fewer expressions to refer to promiscuous men than to refer to promiscuous women. The differing availability of words for men and women reaffirms societal attitude and inequality of the perception of female "promiscuity" ...

Access to Justice: Where We Are Now and Where We Need to Be

     In a world plagued by the diverse forces of poverty, racism, sexism, and more, access to justice has lost its protection as a universal human right, and access to high-quality legal support has become a marker of privilege. Justice has become just another means and system of social stratification that leaves millions, if not billions, vulnerable. Yet, according to international law, legal assistance is supposed to be equally accessible, transparent, and effective. However, in the enforcement and execution of these standards 1  , this fundamental concept is often lost, and equal access to legal support becomes increasingly disparate across different groups. Although there has been a tremendous success over the last years to maximize the use of technology to increase access to justice, much more work is yet to be done. Through a combination of relief-oriented strategies, structural change to the legal system, and long-term educational solutions, access to justice ...